Current File : //proc/thread-self/root/usr/src/linux-headers-6.8.0-59/include/net/iw_handler.h
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
/*
 * This file define the new driver API for Wireless Extensions
 *
 * Version :	8	16.3.07
 *
 * Authors :	Jean Tourrilhes - HPL - <jt@hpl.hp.com>
 * Copyright (c) 2001-2007 Jean Tourrilhes, All Rights Reserved.
 */

#ifndef _IW_HANDLER_H
#define _IW_HANDLER_H

/************************** DOCUMENTATION **************************/
/*
 * Initial driver API (1996 -> onward) :
 * -----------------------------------
 * The initial API just sends the IOCTL request received from user space
 * to the driver (via the driver ioctl handler). The driver has to
 * handle all the rest...
 *
 * The initial API also defines a specific handler in struct net_device
 * to handle wireless statistics.
 *
 * The initial APIs served us well and has proven a reasonably good design.
 * However, there is a few shortcommings :
 *	o No events, everything is a request to the driver.
 *	o Large ioctl function in driver with gigantic switch statement
 *	  (i.e. spaghetti code).
 *	o Driver has to mess up with copy_to/from_user, and in many cases
 *	  does it unproperly. Common mistakes are :
 *		* buffer overflows (no checks or off by one checks)
 *		* call copy_to/from_user with irq disabled
 *	o The user space interface is tied to ioctl because of the use
 *	  copy_to/from_user.
 *
 * New driver API (2002 -> onward) :
 * -------------------------------
 * The new driver API is just a bunch of standard functions (handlers),
 * each handling a specific Wireless Extension. The driver just export
 * the list of handler it supports, and those will be called apropriately.
 *
 * I tried to keep the main advantage of the previous API (simplicity,
 * efficiency and light weight), and also I provide a good dose of backward
 * compatibility (most structures are the same, driver can use both API
 * simultaneously, ...).
 * Hopefully, I've also addressed the shortcomming of the initial API.
 *
 * The advantage of the new API are :
 *	o Handling of Extensions in driver broken in small contained functions
 *	o Tighter checks of ioctl before calling the driver
 *	o Flexible commit strategy (at least, the start of it)
 *	o Backward compatibility (can be mixed with old API)
 *	o Driver doesn't have to worry about memory and user-space issues
 * The last point is important for the following reasons :
 *	o You are now able to call the new driver API from any API you
 *		want (including from within other parts of the kernel).
 *	o Common mistakes are avoided (buffer overflow, user space copy
 *		with irq disabled and so on).
 *
 * The Drawback of the new API are :
 *	o bloat (especially kernel)
 *	o need to migrate existing drivers to new API
 * My initial testing shows that the new API adds around 3kB to the kernel
 * and save between 0 and 5kB from a typical driver.
 * Also, as all structures and data types are unchanged, the migration is
 * quite straightforward (but tedious).
 *
 * ---
 *
 * The new driver API is defined below in this file. User space should
 * not be aware of what's happening down there...
 *
 * A new kernel wrapper is in charge of validating the IOCTLs and calling
 * the appropriate driver handler. This is implemented in :
 *	# net/core/wireless.c
 *
 * The driver export the list of handlers in :
 *	# include/linux/netdevice.h (one place)
 *
 * The new driver API is available for WIRELESS_EXT >= 13.
 * Good luck with migration to the new API ;-)
 */

/* ---------------------- THE IMPLEMENTATION ---------------------- */
/*
 * Some of the choice I've made are pretty controversials. Defining an
 * API is very much weighting compromises. This goes into some of the
 * details and the thinking behind the implementation.
 *
 * Implementation goals :
 * --------------------
 * The implementation goals were as follow :
 *	o Obvious : you should not need a PhD to understand what's happening,
 *		the benefit is easier maintenance.
 *	o Flexible : it should accommodate a wide variety of driver
 *		implementations and be as flexible as the old API.
 *	o Lean : it should be efficient memory wise to minimise the impact
 *		on kernel footprint.
 *	o Transparent to user space : the large number of user space
 *		applications that use Wireless Extensions should not need
 *		any modifications.
 *
 * Array of functions versus Struct of functions
 * ---------------------------------------------
 * 1) Having an array of functions allow the kernel code to access the
 * handler in a single lookup, which is much more efficient (think hash
 * table here).
 * 2) The only drawback is that driver writer may put their handler in
 * the wrong slot. This is trivial to test (I set the frequency, the
 * bitrate changes). Once the handler is in the proper slot, it will be
 * there forever, because the array is only extended at the end.
 * 3) Backward/forward compatibility : adding new handler just require
 * extending the array, so you can put newer driver in older kernel
 * without having to patch the kernel code (and vice versa).
 *
 * All handler are of the same generic type
 * ----------------------------------------
 * That's a feature !!!
 * 1) Having a generic handler allow to have generic code, which is more
 * efficient. If each of the handler was individually typed I would need
 * to add a big switch in the kernel (== more bloat). This solution is
 * more scalable, adding new Wireless Extensions doesn't add new code.
 * 2) You can use the same handler in different slots of the array. For
 * hardware, it may be more efficient or logical to handle multiple
 * Wireless Extensions with a single function, and the API allow you to
 * do that. (An example would be a single record on the card to control
 * both bitrate and frequency, the handler would read the old record,
 * modify it according to info->cmd and rewrite it).
 *
 * Functions prototype uses union iwreq_data
 * -----------------------------------------
 * Some would have preferred functions defined this way :
 *	static int mydriver_ioctl_setrate(struct net_device *dev, 
 *					  long rate, int auto)
 * 1) The kernel code doesn't "validate" the content of iwreq_data, and
 * can't do it (different hardware may have different notion of what a
 * valid frequency is), so we don't pretend that we do it.
 * 2) The above form is not extendable. If I want to add a flag (for
 * example to distinguish setting max rate and basic rate), I would
 * break the prototype. Using iwreq_data is more flexible.
 * 3) Also, the above form is not generic (see above).
 * 4) I don't expect driver developper using the wrong field of the
 * union (Doh !), so static typechecking doesn't add much value.
 * 5) Lastly, you can skip the union by doing :
 *	static int mydriver_ioctl_setrate(struct net_device *dev,
 *					  struct iw_request_info *info,
 *					  struct iw_param *rrq,
 *					  char *extra)
 * And then adding the handler in the array like this :
 *        (iw_handler) mydriver_ioctl_setrate,             // SIOCSIWRATE
 *
 * Using functions and not a registry
 * ----------------------------------
 * Another implementation option would have been for every instance to
 * define a registry (a struct containing all the Wireless Extensions)
 * and only have a function to commit the registry to the hardware.
 * 1) This approach can be emulated by the current code, but not
 * vice versa.
 * 2) Some drivers don't keep any configuration in the driver, for them
 * adding such a registry would be a significant bloat.
 * 3) The code to translate from Wireless Extension to native format is
 * needed anyway, so it would not reduce significantely the amount of code.
 * 4) The current approach only selectively translate Wireless Extensions
 * to native format and only selectively set, whereas the registry approach
 * would require to translate all WE and set all parameters for any single
 * change.
 * 5) For many Wireless Extensions, the GET operation return the current
 * dynamic value, not the value that was set.
 *
 * This header is <net/iw_handler.h>
 * ---------------------------------
 * 1) This header is kernel space only and should not be exported to
 * user space. Headers in "include/linux/" are exported, headers in
 * "include/net/" are not.
 *
 * Mixed 32/64 bit issues
 * ----------------------
 * The Wireless Extensions are designed to be 64 bit clean, by using only
 * datatypes with explicit storage size.
 * There are some issues related to kernel and user space using different
 * memory model, and in particular 64bit kernel with 32bit user space.
 * The problem is related to struct iw_point, that contains a pointer
 * that *may* need to be translated.
 * This is quite messy. The new API doesn't solve this problem (it can't),
 * but is a step in the right direction :
 * 1) Meta data about each ioctl is easily available, so we know what type
 * of translation is needed.
 * 2) The move of data between kernel and user space is only done in a single
 * place in the kernel, so adding specific hooks in there is possible.
 * 3) In the long term, it allows to move away from using ioctl as the
 * user space API.
 *
 * So many comments and so few code
 * --------------------------------
 * That's a feature. Comments won't bloat the resulting kernel binary.
 */

/***************************** INCLUDES *****************************/

#include <linux/wireless.h>		/* IOCTL user space API */
#include <linux/if_ether.h>

/***************************** VERSION *****************************/
/*
 * This constant is used to know which version of the driver API is
 * available. Hopefully, this will be pretty stable and no changes
 * will be needed...
 * I just plan to increment with each new version.
 */
#define IW_HANDLER_VERSION	8

/*
 * Changes :
 *
 * V2 to V3
 * --------
 *	- Move event definition in <linux/wireless.h>
 *	- Add Wireless Event support :
 *		o wireless_send_event() prototype
 *		o iwe_stream_add_event/point() inline functions
 * V3 to V4
 * --------
 *	- Reshuffle IW_HEADER_TYPE_XXX to map IW_PRIV_TYPE_XXX changes
 *
 * V4 to V5
 * --------
 *	- Add new spy support : struct iw_spy_data & prototypes
 *
 * V5 to V6
 * --------
 *	- Change the way we get to spy_data method for added safety
 *	- Remove spy #ifdef, they are always on -> cleaner code
 *	- Add IW_DESCR_FLAG_NOMAX flag for very large requests
 *	- Start migrating get_wireless_stats to struct iw_handler_def
 *
 * V6 to V7
 * --------
 *	- Add struct ieee80211_device pointer in struct iw_public_data
 *	- Remove (struct iw_point *)->pointer from events and streams
 *	- Remove spy_offset from struct iw_handler_def
 *	- Add "check" version of event macros for ieee802.11 stack
 *
 * V7 to V8
 * ----------
 *	- Prevent leaking of kernel space in stream on 64 bits.
 */

/**************************** CONSTANTS ****************************/

/* Enhanced spy support available */
#define IW_WIRELESS_SPY
#define IW_WIRELESS_THRSPY

/* Special error message for the driver to indicate that we
 * should do a commit after return from the iw_handler */
#define EIWCOMMIT	EINPROGRESS

/* Flags available in struct iw_request_info */
#define IW_REQUEST_FLAG_COMPAT	0x0001	/* Compat ioctl call */

/* Type of headers we know about (basically union iwreq_data) */
#define IW_HEADER_TYPE_NULL	0	/* Not available */
#define IW_HEADER_TYPE_CHAR	2	/* char [IFNAMSIZ] */
#define IW_HEADER_TYPE_UINT	4	/* __u32 */
#define IW_HEADER_TYPE_FREQ	5	/* struct iw_freq */
#define IW_HEADER_TYPE_ADDR	6	/* struct sockaddr */
#define IW_HEADER_TYPE_POINT	8	/* struct iw_point */
#define IW_HEADER_TYPE_PARAM	9	/* struct iw_param */
#define IW_HEADER_TYPE_QUAL	10	/* struct iw_quality */

/* Handling flags */
/* Most are not implemented. I just use them as a reminder of some
 * cool features we might need one day ;-) */
#define IW_DESCR_FLAG_NONE	0x0000	/* Obvious */
/* Wrapper level flags */
#define IW_DESCR_FLAG_DUMP	0x0001	/* Not part of the dump command */
#define IW_DESCR_FLAG_EVENT	0x0002	/* Generate an event on SET */
#define IW_DESCR_FLAG_RESTRICT	0x0004	/* GET : request is ROOT only */
				/* SET : Omit payload from generated iwevent */
#define IW_DESCR_FLAG_NOMAX	0x0008	/* GET : no limit on request size */
/* Driver level flags */
#define IW_DESCR_FLAG_WAIT	0x0100	/* Wait for driver event */

/****************************** TYPES ******************************/

/* ----------------------- WIRELESS HANDLER ----------------------- */
/*
 * A wireless handler is just a standard function, that looks like the
 * ioctl handler.
 * We also define there how a handler list look like... As the Wireless
 * Extension space is quite dense, we use a simple array, which is faster
 * (that's the perfect hash table ;-).
 */

/*
 * Meta data about the request passed to the iw_handler.
 * Most handlers can safely ignore what's in there.
 * The 'cmd' field might come handy if you want to use the same handler
 * for multiple command...
 * This struct is also my long term insurance. I can add new fields here
 * without breaking the prototype of iw_handler...
 */
struct iw_request_info {
	__u16		cmd;		/* Wireless Extension command */
	__u16		flags;		/* More to come ;-) */
};

struct net_device;

/*
 * This is how a function handling a Wireless Extension should look
 * like (both get and set, standard and private).
 */
typedef int (*iw_handler)(struct net_device *dev, struct iw_request_info *info,
			  union iwreq_data *wrqu, char *extra);

/*
 * This define all the handler that the driver export.
 * As you need only one per driver type, please use a static const
 * shared by all driver instances... Same for the members...
 * This will be linked from net_device in <linux/netdevice.h>
 */
struct iw_handler_def {

	/* Array of handlers for standard ioctls
	 * We will call dev->wireless_handlers->standard[ioctl - SIOCIWFIRST]
	 */
	const iw_handler *	standard;
	/* Number of handlers defined (more precisely, index of the
	 * last defined handler + 1) */
	__u16			num_standard;

#ifdef CONFIG_WEXT_PRIV
	__u16			num_private;
	/* Number of private arg description */
	__u16			num_private_args;
	/* Array of handlers for private ioctls
	 * Will call dev->wireless_handlers->private[ioctl - SIOCIWFIRSTPRIV]
	 */
	const iw_handler *	private;

	/* Arguments of private handler. This one is just a list, so you
	 * can put it in any order you want and should not leave holes...
	 * We will automatically export that to user space... */
	const struct iw_priv_args *	private_args;
#endif

	/* New location of get_wireless_stats, to de-bloat struct net_device.
	 * The old pointer in struct net_device will be gradually phased
	 * out, and drivers are encouraged to use this one... */
	struct iw_statistics*	(*get_wireless_stats)(struct net_device *dev);
};

/* ---------------------- IOCTL DESCRIPTION ---------------------- */
/*
 * One of the main goal of the new interface is to deal entirely with
 * user space/kernel space memory move.
 * For that, we need to know :
 *	o if iwreq is a pointer or contain the full data
 *	o what is the size of the data to copy
 *
 * For private IOCTLs, we use the same rules as used by iwpriv and
 * defined in struct iw_priv_args.
 *
 * For standard IOCTLs, things are quite different and we need to
 * use the structures below. Actually, this struct is also more
 * efficient, but that's another story...
 */

/*
 * Describe how a standard IOCTL looks like.
 */
struct iw_ioctl_description {
	__u8	header_type;		/* NULL, iw_point or other */
	__u8	token_type;		/* Future */
	__u16	token_size;		/* Granularity of payload */
	__u16	min_tokens;		/* Min acceptable token number */
	__u16	max_tokens;		/* Max acceptable token number */
	__u32	flags;			/* Special handling of the request */
};

/* Need to think of short header translation table. Later. */

/* --------------------- ENHANCED SPY SUPPORT --------------------- */
/*
 * In the old days, the driver was handling spy support all by itself.
 * Now, the driver can delegate this task to Wireless Extensions.
 * It needs to include this struct in its private part and use the
 * standard spy iw_handler.
 */

/*
 * Instance specific spy data, i.e. addresses spied and quality for them.
 */
struct iw_spy_data {
	/* --- Standard spy support --- */
	int			spy_number;
	u_char			spy_address[IW_MAX_SPY][ETH_ALEN];
	struct iw_quality	spy_stat[IW_MAX_SPY];
	/* --- Enhanced spy support (event) */
	struct iw_quality	spy_thr_low;	/* Low threshold */
	struct iw_quality	spy_thr_high;	/* High threshold */
	u_char			spy_thr_under[IW_MAX_SPY];
};

/* --------------------- DEVICE WIRELESS DATA --------------------- */
/*
 * This is all the wireless data specific to a device instance that
 * is managed by the core of Wireless Extensions or the 802.11 layer.
 * We only keep pointer to those structures, so that a driver is free
 * to share them between instances.
 * This structure should be initialised before registering the device.
 * Access to this data follow the same rules as any other struct net_device
 * data (i.e. valid as long as struct net_device exist, same locking rules).
 */
/* Forward declaration */
struct libipw_device;
/* The struct */
struct iw_public_data {
	/* Driver enhanced spy support */
	struct iw_spy_data *		spy_data;
	/* Legacy structure managed by the ipw2x00-specific IEEE 802.11 layer */
	struct libipw_device *		libipw;
};

/**************************** PROTOTYPES ****************************/
/*
 * Functions part of the Wireless Extensions (defined in net/wireless/wext-core.c).
 * Those may be called by driver modules.
 */

/* Send a single event to user space */
void wireless_send_event(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int cmd,
			 union iwreq_data *wrqu, const char *extra);
#ifdef CONFIG_WEXT_CORE
/* flush all previous wext events - if work is done from netdev notifiers */
void wireless_nlevent_flush(void);
#else
static inline void wireless_nlevent_flush(void) {}
#endif

/* We may need a function to send a stream of events to user space.
 * More on that later... */

/* Standard handler for SIOCSIWSPY */
int iw_handler_set_spy(struct net_device *dev, struct iw_request_info *info,
		       union iwreq_data *wrqu, char *extra);
/* Standard handler for SIOCGIWSPY */
int iw_handler_get_spy(struct net_device *dev, struct iw_request_info *info,
		       union iwreq_data *wrqu, char *extra);
/* Standard handler for SIOCSIWTHRSPY */
int iw_handler_set_thrspy(struct net_device *dev, struct iw_request_info *info,
			  union iwreq_data *wrqu, char *extra);
/* Standard handler for SIOCGIWTHRSPY */
int iw_handler_get_thrspy(struct net_device *dev, struct iw_request_info *info,
			  union iwreq_data *wrqu, char *extra);
/* Driver call to update spy records */
void wireless_spy_update(struct net_device *dev, unsigned char *address,
			 struct iw_quality *wstats);

/************************* INLINE FUNTIONS *************************/
/*
 * Function that are so simple that it's more efficient inlining them
 */

static inline int iwe_stream_lcp_len(struct iw_request_info *info)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
	if (info->flags & IW_REQUEST_FLAG_COMPAT)
		return IW_EV_COMPAT_LCP_LEN;
#endif
	return IW_EV_LCP_LEN;
}

static inline int iwe_stream_point_len(struct iw_request_info *info)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
	if (info->flags & IW_REQUEST_FLAG_COMPAT)
		return IW_EV_COMPAT_POINT_LEN;
#endif
	return IW_EV_POINT_LEN;
}

static inline int iwe_stream_event_len_adjust(struct iw_request_info *info,
					      int event_len)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
	if (info->flags & IW_REQUEST_FLAG_COMPAT) {
		event_len -= IW_EV_LCP_LEN;
		event_len += IW_EV_COMPAT_LCP_LEN;
	}
#endif

	return event_len;
}

/*------------------------------------------------------------------*/
/*
 * Wrapper to add an Wireless Event to a stream of events.
 */
char *iwe_stream_add_event(struct iw_request_info *info, char *stream,
			   char *ends, struct iw_event *iwe, int event_len);

static inline char *
iwe_stream_add_event_check(struct iw_request_info *info, char *stream,
			   char *ends, struct iw_event *iwe, int event_len)
{
	char *res = iwe_stream_add_event(info, stream, ends, iwe, event_len);

	if (res == stream)
		return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
	return res;
}

/*------------------------------------------------------------------*/
/*
 * Wrapper to add an short Wireless Event containing a pointer to a
 * stream of events.
 */
char *iwe_stream_add_point(struct iw_request_info *info, char *stream,
			   char *ends, struct iw_event *iwe, char *extra);

static inline char *
iwe_stream_add_point_check(struct iw_request_info *info, char *stream,
			   char *ends, struct iw_event *iwe, char *extra)
{
	char *res = iwe_stream_add_point(info, stream, ends, iwe, extra);

	if (res == stream)
		return ERR_PTR(-E2BIG);
	return res;
}

/*------------------------------------------------------------------*/
/*
 * Wrapper to add a value to a Wireless Event in a stream of events.
 * Be careful, this one is tricky to use properly :
 * At the first run, you need to have (value = event + IW_EV_LCP_LEN).
 */
char *iwe_stream_add_value(struct iw_request_info *info, char *event,
			   char *value, char *ends, struct iw_event *iwe,
			   int event_len);

#endif	/* _IW_HANDLER_H */
¿Qué es la limpieza dental de perros? - Clínica veterinaria


Es la eliminación del sarro y la placa adherida a la superficie de los dientes mediante un equipo de ultrasonidos que garantiza la integridad de las piezas dentales a la vez que elimina en profundidad cualquier resto de suciedad.

A continuación se procede al pulido de los dientes mediante una fresa especial que elimina la placa bacteriana y devuelve a los dientes el aspecto sano que deben tener.

Una vez terminado todo el proceso, se mantiene al perro en observación hasta que se despierta de la anestesia, bajo la atenta supervisión de un veterinario.

¿Cada cuánto tiempo tengo que hacerle una limpieza dental a mi perro?

A partir de cierta edad, los perros pueden necesitar una limpieza dental anual o bianual. Depende de cada caso. En líneas generales, puede decirse que los perros de razas pequeñas suelen acumular más sarro y suelen necesitar una atención mayor en cuanto a higiene dental.


Riesgos de una mala higiene


Los riesgos más evidentes de una mala higiene dental en los perros son los siguientes:

  • Cuando la acumulación de sarro no se trata, se puede producir una inflamación y retracción de las encías que puede descalzar el diente y provocar caídas.
  • Mal aliento (halitosis).
  • Sarro perros
  • Puede ir a más
  • Las bacterias de la placa pueden trasladarse a través del torrente circulatorio a órganos vitales como el corazón ocasionando problemas de endocarditis en las válvulas. Las bacterias pueden incluso acantonarse en huesos (La osteomielitis es la infección ósea, tanto cortical como medular) provocando mucho dolor y una artritis séptica).

¿Cómo se forma el sarro?

El sarro es la calcificación de la placa dental. Los restos de alimentos, junto con las bacterias presentes en la boca, van a formar la placa bacteriana o placa dental. Si la placa no se retira, al mezclarse con la saliva y los minerales presentes en ella, reaccionará formando una costra. La placa se calcifica y se forma el sarro.

El sarro, cuando se forma, es de color blanquecino pero a medida que pasa el tiempo se va poniendo amarillo y luego marrón.

Síntomas de una pobre higiene dental
La señal más obvia de una mala salud dental canina es el mal aliento.

Sin embargo, a veces no es tan fácil de detectar
Y hay perros que no se dejan abrir la boca por su dueño. Por ejemplo…

Recientemente nos trajeron a la clínica a un perro que parpadeaba de un ojo y decía su dueño que le picaba un lado de la cara. Tenía molestias y dificultad para comer, lo que había llevado a sus dueños a comprarle comida blanda (que suele ser un poco más cara y llevar más contenido en grasa) durante medio año. Después de una exploración oftalmológica, nos dimos cuenta de que el ojo tenía una úlcera en la córnea probablemente de rascarse . Además, el canto lateral del ojo estaba inflamado. Tenía lo que en humanos llamamos flemón pero como era un perro de pelo largo, no se le notaba a simple vista. Al abrirle la boca nos llamó la atención el ver una muela llena de sarro. Le realizamos una radiografía y encontramos una fístula que llegaba hasta la parte inferior del ojo.

Le tuvimos que extraer la muela. Tras esto, el ojo se curó completamente con unos colirios y una lentilla protectora de úlcera. Afortunadamente, la úlcera no profundizó y no perforó el ojo. Ahora el perro come perfectamente a pesar de haber perdido una muela.

¿Cómo mantener la higiene dental de tu perro?
Hay varias maneras de prevenir problemas derivados de la salud dental de tu perro.

Limpiezas de dientes en casa
Es recomendable limpiar los dientes de tu perro semanal o diariamente si se puede. Existe una gran variedad de productos que se pueden utilizar:

Pastas de dientes.
Cepillos de dientes o dedales para el dedo índice, que hacen más fácil la limpieza.
Colutorios para echar en agua de bebida o directamente sobre el diente en líquido o en spray.

En la Clínica Tus Veterinarios enseñamos a nuestros clientes a tomar el hábito de limpiar los dientes de sus perros desde que son cachorros. Esto responde a nuestro compromiso con la prevención de enfermedades caninas.

Hoy en día tenemos muchos clientes que limpian los dientes todos los días a su mascota, y como resultado, se ahorran el dinero de hacer limpiezas dentales profesionales y consiguen una mejor salud de su perro.


Limpiezas dentales profesionales de perros y gatos

Recomendamos hacer una limpieza dental especializada anualmente. La realizamos con un aparato de ultrasonidos que utiliza agua para quitar el sarro. Después, procedemos a pulir los dientes con un cepillo de alta velocidad y una pasta especial. Hacemos esto para proteger el esmalte.

La frecuencia de limpiezas dentales necesaria varía mucho entre razas. En general, las razas grandes tienen buena calidad de esmalte, por lo que no necesitan hacerlo tan a menudo e incluso pueden pasarse la vida sin requerir una limpieza. Sin embargo, razas pequeñas como el Yorkshire o el Maltés, deben hacérselas todos los años desde cachorros si se quiere conservar sus piezas dentales.

Otro factor fundamental es la calidad del pienso. Algunas marcas han diseñado croquetas que limpian la superficie del diente y de la muela al masticarse.

Ultrasonido para perros

¿Se necesita anestesia para las limpiezas dentales de perros y gatos?

La limpieza dental en perros no es una técnica que pueda practicarse sin anestesia general , aunque hay veces que los propietarios no quieren anestesiar y si tiene poco sarro y el perro es muy bueno se puede intentar…… , pero no se va a poder pulir ni acceder a todas la zona de la boca …. Además los limpiadores dentales van a irrigar agua y hay riesgo de aspiración a vías respiratorias si no se realiza una anestesia correcta con intubación traqueal . En resumen , sin anestesia no se va hacer una correcta limpieza dental.

Tampoco sirve la sedación ya que necesitamos que el animal esté totalmente quieto, y el veterinario tenga un acceso completo a todas sus piezas dentales y encías.

Alimentos para la limpieza dental

Hay que tener cierto cuidado a la hora de comprar determinados alimentos porque no todos son saludables. Algunos tienen demasiado contenido graso, que en exceso puede causar problemas cardiovasculares y obesidad.

Los mejores alimentos para los dientes son aquellos que están elaborados por empresas farmacéuticas y llevan componentes químicos con tratamientos específicos para el diente del perro. Esto implica no solo limpieza a través de la acción mecánica de morder sino también un tratamiento antibacteriano para prevenir el sarro.

Conclusión

Si eres como la mayoría de dueños, por falta de tiempo , es probable que no estés prestando la suficiente atención a la limpieza dental de tu perro. Por eso te animamos a que comiences a limpiar los dientes de tu perro y consideres atender a su higiene bucal con frecuencia.

Estas simples medidas pueden conllevar a que tu perro tenga una vida más larga y mucho más saludable.

Si te resulta imposible introducir un cepillo de dientes a tu perro en la boca, pásate con él por clínica Tus Veterinarios y te explicamos cómo hacerlo.

Necesitas hacer una limpieza dental profesional a tu mascota?
Llámanos al 622575274 o contacta con nosotros

Deja un comentario

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

¡Hola!